Over and out: Synthetic biology enables two-way communication between mammalian cells

HEK-293 cells

HEK-293 cells were used to synthetically design a two-communication system in mammalian cells. (Image: ATCC)

Published online in Nature Biotechnology last week, a multi-national team from Switzerland, Germany and France demonstrated the first example of rationally designed, two-way communication between mammalian cells (Source). While the microbiologist might scoff at this and point to any of the glut of literature describing synthetically design genetic circuits and phenotypic responses achieved in bacterial and yeast systems, the mammalian cell poses a significantly greater challenge. In the Letters publication, Bacchus et al. describe the engineering of “sender,” “processer” and “receiver” cells (all HEK-293 cells, a favorite for mammalian genetic engineers due to the ease of introducing foreign DNA) to exchange a variety of signaling molecules (including L-tryptophan, VEGF and acetaldehyde) in order to trigger specific, and pre-determined phenotypic responses.

This is huge.

This is the first time that mammalian cells have been rationally designed to mimic natural behavior in order to produce a specifically desired response. Even more impressively, they  didn’t leave their demonstration at just a simple signaling exchange – they showed a realistic, biologically relevant phenotypic response! The authors designed an experiment wherein a co-culture of cells designed to express and respond to different stimuli simulated the production and maturation of blood vessels. Using the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin-1 (Ang1), the authors observed that their system reproduced the characteristic transient permeability and tightening of endothelial layers which are critically important to the growth of blood vessels.

The authors emphasize the important point that, in contrast to bacteria and yeast, multicellular organisms are composed of specialized cell populations that tightly coordinate their physiology by intercellular communication. This article represents the first reverse-engineering of this intercellular communication, and in particular the first to reproduce a realistic biological phenomena. This development can provide two important opportunities for the research community: first, it can provide the tools to dissect important communication pathways and finely understand the nuances of these communications, much in the same way that recombinant DNA technology allowed us to do for gene networks; and second it provides the opportunity to design more biocompatible implants capable of communicating and interfacing with our natural physiology.

Catch the article in the link below!

References

  • Bacchus, W. et al. Synthetic two-way communication between mammalian cells. Nature Biotechnology (2012).doi:10.1038/nbt.2351 (Source)

Related Posts

11 thoughts on “Over and out: Synthetic biology enables two-way communication between mammalian cells

  1. Hello, my name is Rebecca, and I’m an undergraduate biology student at the University of Southern California.

    I’m part of a synthetic biology team that competes in the International Genetically Modified Organism (iGEM) competition.

    As part of our project, we made the bacteria E. coli sing. We’ve also tried using quorum sensing to initiate and direct the singing of the E. coli. We’ve directly discovered that it’s not easy in bacteria and yeast at all, actually, so I imagine it must be even more difficult in mammalian cells.

    We also made a video of our efforts in genetically engineering singing bacteria:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_VsqPCiNXo

    Also, in relation to your post on more companies needing to post their protocols, we tried doing something more for entertainment value, but similar: How to genetically engineer bacteria.

    • Hi Rebecca,

      Very cool iGEM project! I watched your video and I think that your idea to make E. coli sing is definitely an “out-of-the-box” indicatory of bacterial physiology/environmental response. Also, making a sort of “machine interface” by analyzing the flagellar rotation with mathematical algorithms was a nice approach to deconvolute the rotational signal and transduce it into the alternative, acoustic signal.

      A question: How is this different/better/worse than the more common indicators of bacterial response like galactosidase activity, fluorescence reporters, etc?

      Having spent a significant amount of time trying to put foreign DNA into mammalian cells, I can definitely vouch for the difficulty. Using HEK cells is really the best option because they are the most readily accepting of it, but most cells (especially immunological cells) will die if you introduce foreign DNA. Unlike bacterial cells, you can’t really make mammalian cells “competent.”

      Great job,
      JY

  2. Pingback: Seeing… quadruple? Quantitative visualization of G-quadruplex DNA expands our knowledge of genome structure and organization – Laboratorio Italia

  3. Pingback: Happy New Year! Plus, an Inspirational Science Wallpaper! – Laboratorio Italia

  4. Pingback: And the retractions continue: Two stem cell papers retracted by Japanese reasearcher – Laboratorio Italia

  5. Pingback: Why more companies need to publish video protocols | Laboratorio Italia

  6. Pingback: Ready, Set, Model! | Laboratorio Italia

  7. Pingback: “Up to no good…” | Laboratorio Italia

  8. Pingback: Minecraft as a tool for biological models? Maybe! – A neuron built out of Minecraft bricks | Living Biology

  9. Pingback: Happy DNA Day! 5 internet favorites to celebrate 60 years since the discovery of the structure of DNA | Living Biology

  10. Pingback: Left Helix: Yellow! Rational design of single-chain peptide-based nanostructures | Living Biology

Leave a Reply